|
Craig David Parr, Still From: 'The Story Of The Clock Part II', Digital Video, 2015 |
Earlier this summer, I
entered several pieces of work into the selection process for the ‘Nottingham Castle Open 2015’
exhibition. I wasn’t successful but, now
that the exhibition is open, I went along the other day to have a look anyway.
Sadly, I wasn’t particularly impressed. I know that will sound like sour grapes but
it’s really not supposed to. I
understand there’s an aspect of lottery about all such open selections, and
that the particular priorities (or tastes) of any selection panel
must always be taken into account. In
the event, the quality and validity (or otherwise) of my own entries aren’t
particularly relevant anyway, as it appears that anything resembling painting
was hardly on the selection panel’s agenda.
To be honest, this deliberate downplaying of a particular medium in
favour of more technologically ‘sexy’ forms seems pretty shortsighted these
days, and I do feel we should be over all this ideological ‘Painting Is dead’
nonsense by now.
Nevertheless, I’m certainly
no media purist, and happy to consider work in any mode on a given day. The unfortunate fact is that there just isn’t
much in the exhibition that resonated with me, and rather too much that felt a
bit facile or just like empty gestures.
One or two pieces really are just poorly executed, in truth. That seems a little unforgivable, as I imagine
the selectors weren’t short of entries to draw on for a show of relatively
modest dimensions.
|
Anthony Fletcher, Still From: 'Transcend', 16mm Film Transferred To HD Digital Video, 2015 |
I did however enjoy the
generally intelligent use of the available gallery space and the decision to create an
impressive atmosphere by painting the walls dark grey and restricting the
ambient lighting. Video is the single
most prevalent medium represented, and clearly benefits from such a theatrical
context, (as do the other light-based pieces).
However, everything else is generally well spot-lit too, and all the
work has a fair chance to shine. It’s a
shame then, that the wall captions feature some of the least illuminating
and occasionally, nonsensical artist’s statements I’ve read in a long while [1.], (not necessarily the curators’ fault, I realise).
|
Anthony Fletcher, Still From: 'Transcend', 16mm Film Transferred To HD Digital Video, 2015 |
Anyway, enough with the
negative comments. If little actually
rocked my world, there are a small handful of pieces that at least made my
visit (almost) worth the effort [2.]. In the interests of positivity, let’s focus on them for now.
|
Anthony Fletcher, Still From: 'Transcend', 16mm Film Transferred To HD Digital Video, 2015 |
Anthony Fletcher’s video, ‘Transcend’ is a
nebulous melange of nearly unidentifiable visual impressions. Rippling water and suggestions of foliage
occasionally emerge in an unfocussed manner, but mostly it just resembles a
restless stream of visual ambience. It’s
probably not too difficult to just unfocus or mis-expose a variety of footage
and layer it into the visual equivalent of a track from Aphex Twin’s second
album, but I found the piece pleasingly hypnotic and well enough put together all the same. The duration between its loops feels about right, and the variation in abstract visual qualities
is sufficient to hold my attention throughout.
What really makes it is the deliberate use of 16mm film stock, with all
its attendant glitches and analogue warmth, before the transfer to an HD
digital format. That
analogue/digital stand-off isn’t exactly new territory, but it pleases me that
Fletcher addresses it in a way that is as much about visual pleasure as anything
else, in the first instance.
|
Craig David Parr, 'The Story Of The Clock Parts I, II & III', Digital Video, 2015 |
Another video piece that
appealed to me, but for very different reasons, is Craig David Parr’s three-part ‘The Story Of The Clock’,
shown concurrently on separate screens.
This is a resolutely ramshackle undertaking, recalling the absurdist
existentialism at the heart of Samuel Beckett, the messy pranksterism of Paul McCarthy, or even the ribald excesses of Alfred Jarry. In the first chapter, an (the) artist
character constructs a large, clumsily-made clock face sculpture whilst
wearing a crude, papier maché pig-like head.
The second part records his struggle to push this up a flight of stairs
with obvious difficulty and relatively little progress, (the stairs extending much
further than he's able to climb).
Finally, the pig/artist drops his trousers, produces a grossly distended
fake member, and proceeds to masturbate over the clock face in what looks like
a semi-industrial studio setting.
|
Craig David Parr, Still From: 'The Story Of The Clock Part I', Digital Video, 2015 |
|
Craig David Parr, Still From: 'The Story Of The Clock Part III', Digital Video, 2015 |
Clearly, we’re not dealing with aesthetic refinement or any form of subtlety here. However, the piece has a stylistic
consistency and a variety of internal (il)logic. This is one of two pieces by Parr in the
exhibition, and he has a stated mission to question ideas about cultural
authority or the validity of perceived Utopias.
I didn’t really get too much of a sense of the latter from ‘The Story Of The Clock’,
preferring to read it, more generally, as a thinly-veiled commentary on the
futility of human and artistic, (or indeed critical), endeavour, and the inescapability of
mortality. On reflection, maybe those
things do connect with the idea of Utopia after all. Not unimportantly, this piece also made me
laugh inwardly, not least over its blatancy, and the chance topical relevance to grotesque acts of public, pig-based onanism.
|
Richard Sandell, Images From: 'A Tough Year For The Sirens', C-Type Photographic Prints. 2014 |
Oddly, the other two pieces that
held my attention are both photographic projects relating to swimming
pools [3.]. Richard Sandell’s
paired photographs are apparently part of a project documenting both the
travails of mixed gender, age and sexually oriented synchronised swimming team, and the issues of
discrimination raised by their experiences.
In fact, it’s all a fiction, and the hilariously mis-matched team
members depicted in Prof. Sandell’s beautifully composed changing room settings are
actually members of his family. I
enjoyed this combining of an apparent documentary approach with a wholly
fictional narrative, as well as the essential humanity at the heart of the
project. The insertion of all-too-real
individuals into a context as artificially formalised as synchronised swimming
seems rather well-judged.
|
Richard Sandell, 'A Tough Year For The Sirens', C-Type Print, 2014 |
|
Richard Sandell, 'Renato', C-Type Photographic Print, 2014 |
The second pool-related piece
is Holgar Martin’s ‘Main Pool - I Have Been Swimming Here For 15 Years’. This is another beautifully exposed and composed image, this time with a rather more
straightforward documentary agenda. It
is part of a project to document Nottingham’s now defunct Beechdale Swimming Baths, and its changes over the years since it opened in 1970.
|
Holgar Martin, 'Main Pool - I Have Been Swimming Here For 15 Years',
Archival Photographic Print, 2015 |
It occurs to me that,
sensually, large, communal swimming pools are a distinct category of
place. They are very much a world of
light, reflection, formal geometry and particular recurring colours. They are also redolent of certain, instantly
recognisable sensations of smell, humidity and acoustics. Martin implies plenty of that in his
image, but all that delicious, limpid geometry is also typical of a particular
mode of Modernist design, which in turn speaks of the idealistic, communality
of spirit in which many public pools were once built. I grew up taking the construction of such
places as a public amenity for granted. I can’t help suspecting that, nowadays, the majority of swimming pools are
created as part of private, subscription-only health clubs, or in the basements
of billionaire oligarchs.
There we go then. I started this post in a bit of a grump but,
clearly, there were some genuine pleasures to be had, even in a somewhat
disappointing exhibition. Perversely though,
I’m going to end as I started…
A Word To The Wise:
Should you find yourself
visiting Nottingham, (an experience I would normally endorse), do yourself a
favour and avoid the City Council-run Broadmarsh Centre Car Park. I’m generally a fan of the dystopian glamour
of your average dilapidated multi-story car park, but this one’s becoming almost unusable. I queued for 45 minutes at
several mal-functioning ticket machines, along with an increasingly disgruntled
crowd of Saturday shoppers, just for the privilege of paying for release. What’s worse, once a harassed member of staff
finally appeared to take money in person, my parking fee had actually clicked
over into the next tariff, with no talk of a refund at any stage. On top of the Castle’s admission charge, it
was hardly a cost-effective way to spend Saturday afternoon, Nottingham City
Council (and, more to the point, Mr. Osbourne).
“All that relish for failed utopias
doesn’t look so clever now, does it, smart lad?” - I bet you’re thinking.
'Nottingham Castle Open 2015' continues until 8 November at: Nottingham Castle Museum & Art Gallery, Lenton Road, Nottingham NG1 6EL. I'd recommend allowing enough time to view the whole collection, if you're to get your money's worth.
[1.]: Writing such stuff in a coherent manner certainly
isn’t easy, as I myself discovered, earlier in the year. All the same, I’m not sure it really helps to
just use ‘emotions’ as a vague, catch-all term for, well, nothing very much. At least try to communicate something a
little more specific, folks.
[2.]: If not actually the Castle’s £6.00
admission fee. Perhaps my mood wasn’t
helped by the fact I had to wade through the Beer Festival taking place in the
Castle grounds, before I even got to the main entrance. Don’t get me wrong, - I enjoy a pint of the proper
stuff as much as anyone else. In fact,
on reflection, perhaps I should have stopped off for one on the way in, - it
might have helped.
[3.]: Whilst writing this post, it does occur to me
that one of the more impressive aspects of this show is the way that the
curators have managed to connect certain thematic threads within it. That’s something one wouldn’t necessarily
expect from an open exhibition, for obvious reasons.