'Flagging 10', Acrylics, Paper Collage, Ink, Spray Enamel & French Polish On Paper, 45 cm X 60 cm, 2018 |
Ten it is, then. Here’s the tenth - and last, of my series of
paper-based, flag-derived pieces. It has
extended my scope for doing violence to the flag still further (even if some of
that actually occurred beneath the top surface). However, it definitely seems time to conclude
the series here. I can feel myself
starting to default to the same, familiar solutions, with these, now – and that’s
rarely a good thing (once you become aware of it consciously, at least). Anyway, I think there’s just enough variation and
progression there to let them stand as a self-contained series, so
I’ll probably put them all together in a following post, to offer a final overview and
let you judge for yourself.
For months now, I’ve been presenting
these as ‘work in progress’. That indicates that I’ve always had a sense that
these might mutate further – and for a long time I assumed this would involve the
inclusion of text. At another stage, I
also had ambitions to start physically abrading, eroding and generally abusing
them with power tools, washing machines, chemicals or flames. Such extended periods of “What
if…” reflection, are a perfectly
healthy component of any creative process – but perhaps there was just
a little too much procrastination and indecisiveness last year too.
So, in the interests of
breaking that cycle in 2018, and just bringing things to a more assertive
conclusion - I’ve made some decisions regarding these particular pieces. The versions I’ve already presented over the
last few months, without text, are going to remain in that form - as
physical, paper-based artifacts, at least.
Within the overall ‘This S(c)eptic
Isle’ project, text will continue to be a vital component of much
of the work, and so there’s definitely room for at least part of it to function
on pure image alone. I’m increasingly coming
to an understanding that there’s no imperative for each individual piece to be
trying to do everything at once. It may be a reason for some of my output feeling a bit clogged or overworked,
in the past.
For the same reason, the
(admittedly seductive) notion of employing destructive physical processes, just
feels like a step too far for images that are already dense with visual
distress. Were that idea to play out – I
think it would make more sense to start with a much ‘straighter’ rendition of
the flag, and let the physical attack do more of the heavy lifting – both in
terms of process and implied meaning.
In fact, there is a clear
intention to combine these images with text, but to do so by recycling them
through a completely different medium. I’ve
alluded several times to my idea that my related ‘Below The Line / Beneath Contempt’ text piece might be presented
in video form, and I’ve decided to
definitely forge ahead with that plan this year. Any
further mutation of these flag images should occur in the digital realm, as a
component of that. As that particular
piece of writing is quite deliberately constructed from found sources, it seems
quite appropriate that I should continue the theme by recycling and translating
my own material too. It also squares with my growing
interest in the repurposing of original content, and the wider issues of
authorship and appropriation, over the last couple of years. The intention to follow through on my
oft-expressed desire to make more A.V. work does, of course, release a whole
new tranche of unknowns (and new skills to be acquired), but I’m already in the
process of taking the best photos I can of each piece, and recruiting some
much-needed technical assistance, to that end.
There are a couple of final
points to make, while we’re at it.
Firstly: These pieces are no longer untitled. I’ve decided that the series as a whole is
now called ‘Flagging’, and so - for
want of a brighter idea, these works will be known as ‘Flagging 1 -10’. Titling has already been a bit of a thorny problem within this overall project, and I've also learned (from bitter experience), that the whole 'Untitled' thing can cause real problems when cataloguing/exhibiting work - so it's good to get that nailed down. And
finally: yes – I’m well aware I’ve got a right cheek accusing Damien Hirst
of plagiarism or ideas theft (in my last post), in the light of some of the
above - and when I’ve already ‘flagged up’ my own debt to Jasper John’s in these
pieces, more than once.
No comments:
Post a Comment