 |
| Shaun Morris, 'A Minor Place', Oil on Canvas, 2016 |
By the time you read this,
the ‘A Minor Place’ exhibition, at Studley,
Warwickshire’s Artists Workhouse, will have been over for several days and
we’ll be into the vaguely anti-climactic phase of storing returned work,
reflecting on what was achieved, and contemplating what happens next. It’s an obvious time to tie up remaining
loose ends, something I’ll attempt to do here, with reference to the reflective
and projective processes outlined above.
Specifically, I’ll focus on certain aspects of the actual work exhibited,
rather than the exhibition as a whole.
I’ve already dealt with most
of my own completed work over recent months, (although there is one outstanding
post related to that planned). Likewise,
some of Shaun Morris’ work at ‘A Minor
Place’ was discussed in my post about February’s ‘The Lie Of The Land’ exhibition at Artrix, Bromsgrove [1.]. So,
I’ll attempt to avoid over repetition, and concentrate instead on Shaun’s post ‘TLOTL work; Andrew Smith’s recent output;
and on certain relationships with, and implications for, my own
work.
 |
| Shaun Morris, 'After Hours', Oil on Canvas, 2016 |
Let’s start with a piece of
Shaun’s that could, I suppose, have felt slightly overlooked in the hang - but
which actually felt rather comfortable tucked into a corner, on it’s own little
piece of wall, at Artists Workhouse. ‘After Hours’ clearly fits alongside Shaun’s
other nocturnal ‘portraits’ of commercial vehicles. In terms of its painterly, representational
approach, and relatively straightforward composition, it also complies with the
parameters laid down by some of its immediate predecessors. But it does depart slightly from the template,
as with ‘The Machine’ before it, in depicting
something other than a heavy goods vehicle.
It’s actually one of those
quirky little street-cleaning units that stoically trundle the gutters of this
land. If all of Shauns’ vehicle
paintings memorialise the taken-for-granted machines haunting our modern
world’s liminal zones, none could be more (literally) marginal than this one. However grudging the eventual take-up of
driverless passenger transport may or may not be – this feels like exactly the
kind of vehicle that may soon be replaced by a robotic operative.
 |
| Shaun Morris, 'The Wait', Oil on Canvas, 2015 |
My own suspicion is that, as ever
more of the machines around us become autonomous, a seemingly inescapable human
impulse to anthropromorphise, or at least to ascribe animal characteristics to
them, may only grow stronger [2.]. Thus, the constant suggestion of such
tendencies in Shaun’s paintings actually feels pretty much on the money. What could seem a little hokey, actually
suggests an inescapable trait to which we’re all prone - whether or not we
chose to admit it. These may still be
vehicles of the human-operated variety, - and as such the possible end of a
technological line, but they also reflect that same drive (sorry – couldn’t
resist.) [3.].
Actually, that sense of a transforming
world, and his evocation of a rapidly changing economy’s dark corners – is
definitely one of the things that make Shaun’s images resonate in my mind. Oh, and let’s not overlook the typically
skillful deployment of a nocturnal palette illuminated by colour. A red/green juxtaposition is just thrown out
here with calm assurance rather than showy melodrama). Equally of note, is an economically direct
handling of paint that’s largely in keeping with the humble subject.
 |
| (L.) Shaun Morris, 'Artic Landscape', Oil on Canvas, 2016 |
If ‘After Hours’ belongs with the truck paintings from last year, the
two largest pieces in our show, ‘Artic
Landscape’, and the one that lent the overall show its title, suggest a
looking forward to what might come next, and a greater ambition in terms of
environmental scale too. I know Shaun
has been wrestling both paintings into submission, along with two other large
canvases, for much of this year. He’s clearly been looking for new pictorial problems to solve,
in the process.
Place would seem to be the
key with these two - with vehicular references being increasingly absorbed into
their surroundings. ‘Artic Landscape’ (love that punning title, by the way) is a bold,
highly physical affair - full of strong contrasts and muscular statements. Its corral of white tractor units are reduced
to a tract of humped forms, delineated by strong shadows and accents of blood
red, to resemble nothing so much as a field of ice boulders. They may be recognisable (just) as vehicles,
but mostly constitute a forbidding, semi-abstract environment of glacial monuments
one might try to scale. The glossy
secretions of linseed oil on the painting’s surface certainly allude to the original
subject matter, but in a way that is tactile and sensual - far more than it is illustrative.
 |
| Shaun Morris' Prints On Sale |
‘A Minor Place’, on the
other hand, is far more about compositional sophistication, and a meditative gaze
upon the inherent bathos of a very contemporary location. The whole idea of ‘Edgelands’ is, I know, one
that has fascinated Shaun for some time, and this painting seems to epitomise
the kind of alienated, 24-hour infrastructural non-place identified by, amongst
others, Paul Farley and Michael Symmons Roberts [4.].
 |
| ...And On Screen: Shaun Morris, 'Something In The Night', Digital Animation, 2016 |
Glowing green under
industrial lighting, and seemingly lacking any human presence, Shaun’s
warehouse and attendant tarmac expanse represent the kind of heavily automated (and
thus, employment-light) industrial centre addressed in the film work of Patrick
Keiller [5.]. The
trailors lined up by the building are the only real vehicular reference in this
painting, and recall the containerisation remarked upon by both Keiller and
Farley & Simmons-Roberts.
But if his subject matter is
entirely contemporary, Shaun’s mode of depiction harks back to certain
high-points of twentieth-century representational painting. His tendency to abstract slightly; to view a
geometric subject from a slightly ‘off’ oblique angle; the almost-but-not-quite-symmetrical
vertical division; and the pushing of an inconsequential pile of pallets into
the foreground - all call to mind the compositional verve of Richard
Diebenkorn, (and, thus, Matisse and Bonnard before him). The painting might not be as forthright as ‘Artic Landscape’, but it’s actually a rather profound, slow-burning image, in my view.
When not engaging with these
major painterly statements, Shaun has, like myself, also spent some time
producing prints this year. Some were on
sale, but his series of stark, iPad-derived print images could also be viewed
on-screen in our show, along with my ‘Wiped Windows’ photographic series, and
Andrew’s video, ‘Siesta; Stirchley,
Suburb Of Vice’ video. Shaun’s ‘Something In The Night’ images originate from earlier motifs from
his ‘Black Highway’ and ‘Stolen Car’ suites of recent
years. But these stripped-down interpretations
are monochrome in the most binary fashion, and almost primitive in their mode
of depiction – suggesting a digital take on the classic German Expressionist
woodcut.
Whilst all of Shaun’s recent
work in ‘A Minor Place’ could be seen
as a continuum of existing concerns, Andrew Smith did his usual trick of
presenting a body of work I probably couldn’t have predicted from what preceded
it. Indeed, this ability to consistently
do something surprising - and often possessing of its own, possibly obscure,
internal logic, is one of the reasons I always enjoy engaging with his work.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Stock Footage', Set of 18 Digital Prints, 2016 |
This time round, collage
would seem to be the prevailing spirit behind most, if not all of the current work. Last year’s ‘Mental Mapping’ work saw him divining perplexing, or even
disturbingly autobiographical currents from obscure photographic imagery – but this
time, he seems to be capturing psychological resonances inherent within the
juxtaposition of recycled fragments of pre-existing or found images. This may involve the physical reassembly of
actual sections of earlier works, or the use of appropriated imagery from a
completely external source. The
occasional use of salvaged posters, or indeed - recourse to collage in general,
clearly chimes with my own practice in recent years. However, whilst my own approach generally
focuses on a kind of mulch of suggestive visual texture and splintered clues,
Andrew’s may be a bit closer to the Surrealist tradition of automatic
image-generation through chance juxtapositions.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'The New Settlement', Acrylic on Canvas, 2016 |
One obvious example of that
would seem to be his suite of eighteen digital prints, ‘Stock Footage’, mentioned in my last post [6.]. At the other extreme would
be pieces here such as ‘Strange Cove’,
‘The New Settlement’ or ‘Forgery’, which could be read as purely
organic abstractions (and may have been by some). But those titles suggest entire layers of
possible meaning beneath their relatively benign surfaces. My impression is that these may really be the
heavily processed residues of earlier artifacts, freighted with pre-existing
meanings – as opposed to purely visual exercises in balancing colours and
shapes. I even suspect that certain deliberately
painterly passages may actually be vague depictions of layered or torn print
material. If I’m correct in that
interpretation, then there’s a possible connection with my own recent
preoccupation with lost voices, or forgotten or misread meanings, and vestigial
legacies.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Forgery' Mixed Media on Paper, 2016 |
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Strange Cove', Mixed Media on Canvas, 2015 |
Elsewhere, however, we see
that Andrew certainly hasn’t abandoned the use of photographic illusion. ‘Torn
Tower’ is a splendid little image juxtaposing a section of partially demolished
modernist architecture with an apparently abstract mark - which may be the
result of real, accidental damage [7.]. Several pieces also include photographic
representations of staples or pins, or even of pasted layers themselves, which
provide a kind of meta or hyper-real commentary on the nature of collage, even
as other elements in the same piece may be actually physically applied. It’s that kind of sophisticated, multi-level
stuff that gets me every time.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Torn Tower', Digital Print, 2016 |
 |
Andrew Smith, (L.) '"What Makes You Act So Cruelly And Violently Towards The Children"',
(R.) 'Good/Bad Omen', Both: Mixed Media on Canvas, 2016 |
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'The Long Revolution', Digital Print on Canvas, 2016 |
And
should we be missing yet more text elements, or even just the occasional shock
to the system that he’s always been able to supply - Andrew also bungs in a little
of those too. It’s typical of him to
title an almost decorative concoction, (including significant portions of neon
pink), after the incorporated found text, “What
Makes You Act So Cruelly And Violently Towards The Children?” Just when you thought it was safe to start
thinking about Matisse…
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'The New School', Acrylic & Digital Print on Canvas, 2016 |
I have another, rather
particular feeling of engagement with certain of Andrew’s pieces in ‘A Minor Place’, and one that links to
my own work. Earlier this year, before
the opportunity to mount this show arose, I pitched to him the idea of a
collaborative project in which we would effectively re-work or reinterpret each
other’s work. In contemporary music
parlance - it was a kind of remix project, I suppose. We discussed possible approaches, and began
tentative work on a document - initially as an attempt to agree some
parameters, but which showed every sign of becoming an ever expanding, absurdist
artifact in its own right.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Fracker', Acrylic & Digital Print on Canvas, 2015 |
Ever the compartmentaliser –
I had mentally parked the idea in the interim, choosing instead to focus on our
three-handed venture with Shaun. However,
Andrew’s practice, (and possibly his thought processes), appear to unfold in a
more organic and less inhibited manner than mine. Close examination of certain pieces in the
show, as we hung it, revealed recognisable elements from my ‘Vestige’ series, either as an
underlying visual texture - as in ‘The
New School’, or bobbing to the surface in recontextualised fragments - as
in ‘Fracker’. Apart from my enjoyment of both those pieces
on their own terms, this immediately detonated thought bombs in my own mind,
regarding resumption of our original scheme.
 |
| Andrew Smith, 'Divining Of The Fumes', Acrylic & Digital Print on Canvas, 2016 |
Fully expecting a possible
short Post-‘AMP’ lay-off, to recharge
my creative batteries, I instead find my mind racing over forthcoming
possibilities. I’ve already pried ‘The New School’ from Andrew’s grasp,
with a view to continuing the nascent dialogue it represents, and have embarked
on a process of reading/research, inspired by the painting’s title as well as
its visual content. Clearly, I’m
tempting fate by making public such aspirations, but good intentions and a
sense of motivation can only be positives - can’t they? We’ll see…
Anyhow, I hope I’ve already thanked those who deserve special mention, a couple of posts back, (with
apologies to anyone I missed). So it
only remains to thank Shaun and Andrew for being at least two-thirds of the enterprise,
in the first place; and for contributing work that was a pleasure to behold, as
well as a stimulus to new thoughts.
Before finally leaving Studley, we reflected, over a pint, on how the
whole thing felt like a very positive experience. A large factor in that is, I believe, the
fact that it unfolded as a properly equitable three-way split of effort
expended and benefits gained. Cheers,
fellas…
[1.]: For what it’s worth, I’m now the proud owner
of Shaun’s little painting, ‘The Wait’. It’s a piece that struck a chord with me when
I first saw it, in Bromsgrove – and did again in Studley.
[2.]: It’s there in spades, in Disney’s Wall-E
character, - a brave little functionary - not so far removed from Shaun’s road
sweeper, after all. And there’s
obviously a long, noble SF tradition of robots with personality. Today, even as the likely, or less likely,
implications of robotics and A.I. unfold before our eyes – the viability/desirability
of sex with robots is one of the most often (if glibly) conjectured
possibilities. Could there be any
greater evidence of humanity’s drive to blur the distinction between the
biological and the mechanical?
[3.]: Reminding me of my late father’s habit of referring
to any vehicle he owned as ‘She’, for instance.
[4.]: Paul Farley and Michael Symmons Roberts, ‘Edgelands: Journeys Into England’s True
Wilderness’, London, Jonathan Cape, 2011.
[5.]: Patrick Keiller (Dir.), ‘Robinson In Space’,
UK, Konink Productions/BBC/BFI, 1997.
[6.]: Although I now find I was slightly wide of the
mark in my assumptions about their generation.
It appears Andrew began text-first, with found descriptions of stock
film footage, before attempting to visualize them with his overlaid stock
stills. It is thus, a somewhat more
layered and translated process than I originally realised. But, of course!
[7.]: It
seems too delicious that this piece was actually purchased, on the night of our
Private View, by a gentleman who once worked on designing Birmingham’s now
sadly demolished Central Library.
Spooky!
