Showing posts with label Guy Debord. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guy Debord. Show all posts

Friday, 18 February 2022

Completed Painting: 'Territory [Lateral Flow]'

 


'Territory [Lateral Flow]', Acrylic on Panel, 100 cm x 100 cm, 2022


A recently-completed piece of work.  Here are some points to consider:


  • The first piece of physical work after a moderate period of reflection/a reminder of the simple pleasures of 'making'.
  • Certain continuities of approach prevail [conscious method/many metres of masking tape deployed].
  • 'Pure' painting [physical medium/application].
  • A possible portal to subject/sub_ject-ivity [realised within a non-expressionistic mode].
  • A tension between [a form of] photo-realism/synthesised abstraction [formal].
  • A modest [conscious] expansion in scale.






  • Philosophical grounding .
  • Cartography re_set.
  • New ways to access source imagery [mediation = key].
  • Repeated visits in space/time encapsulated [actual/virtual].
  • Imagery nested/layers acknowledged/locations pin_pointed [over_lay].
  • Site-specificity within the drift.
  • Zone of trans_formation.
  • Local[e].






  • A tangent/side-step/run-off [lateral movement].
  • Rhizome junctures [ghost trains/lines of flight].
  • Inter_ruptions in the flow [pause for thought].
  • Stratified space/vacancies en_closed.
  • De/Re_territorialization.
  • Change in elevation [implied]: via_duct/cause_way/the ramp.
  • Death adjacent [with dignity].
  • This is/was the place [time-coded].






"A rhizome may be broken, shattered at a given spot, but it will start up again on one of its old lines, or on new lines... Every rhizome contains lines of segmentarity according to which it is stratified, territorialized, signified, attributed, etc., as well as lines of deterritorialization down which it constantly flees. There is a rupture in the rhizome whenever segmentary lines explode into a line of flight, but the line of flight is part of the rhizome." [1.]

"The map is open and connectable in all of its dimensions; it is detachable, reversible, susceptible to constant modification. It can be torn, reversed, adapted to any kind of mounting, reworked by an individual, group or social formation. It can be drawn on a wall, conceived as a work of art, constructed as a political action or as a meditation." [2.]






"One of the basic situationist practices in the derive, a technique of rapid passage through various ambiences. Derives involve playful-constructive behaviour and awareness of psychogeographical effects, and are thus quite different from the classic notions of journey or stroll... 

"In a derive, one or more persons during a certain period drop their relations, their work and leisure activities, and all their other usual motives for movement and action, and let themselves be drawn by the attractions of the terrain, and the encounters they find there. Chance is a less important factor in this activity than one might think: from a derive point of view cities have psychogeographical contours, with constant currents, fixed points and vortexes that strongly discourage entry into or exit from certain zones.

"But the derive includes both this letting-go, and its necessary contradiction: the domination of psychogeographical variations by the knowledge and calculation of their possibilities." [3.]





[1.] & [2.]: Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari, 'A Thousand Plateaus' (Trans. Brian Massumi), London/NYC/Dublin, Bloomsbury Academic, 1988/2004

[3.]: Guy Debord, 'Theory of the Derive', (Trans. Ken Knabb) Paris, 'Situationist International #2', 1958




Thursday, 28 November 2013

Will Self On 'The Society Of The Spectacle'





In various posts, and different contexts, I’ve variously referred to Situationism, GuyDebord, Psychogeography, Patrick Keiller and Will Self in this blog.  I’ve just caught up with an interesting item on the BBC Radio Programme ‘Night Waves’ in which Self, (himself), draws together all those strands, in interview, following his written introduction to a new edition of Debord’s ‘The Society Of The Spectacle’ [1.].



Guy Debord

Will Self


As usual, Self uses his vast, splendiferous vocabulary with genuine relish but still manages to supply a useful, compact introduction/overview of the items under discussion.  It’s available on the BBC iPlayer here, [2.], and I’d recommend anyone with any interest in those subjects to give it a quick listen, (about 35 minutes into the 45 minute broadcast).





Patrick Keiller (Photo: Fernando Shehani / Guardian)


In passing, it’s also a perfect illustration of why the BBC is still the best broadcaster in the World, (for all its institutional defects), and one of the few remaining things of any real value worth living in Britain for.  What other contemporary media outlet would take the trouble to explain exactly why it is itself part of the very ‘Spectacle’ being critiqued?  We’ll all be irreversibly impoverished once the barbarians dismantle The Beeb, or sell it off, (but that’s a different rant).








[1.]:  Guy Debord (With Introduction By Will Self), ‘The Society Of The Spectacle’, London, Notting Hill Editions, 2013


[2.]:  ‘Night Waves’, BBC Radio 3.  Broadcast: 25 November 2013


Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Bradley Garrett: "Explore Everything' / Terminological Amendment






As I’ve routinely outlined, much of the source material from my artwork, (both visually and conceptually), comes from my wanderings around various cities with a camera.  It’s an ongoing activity that I try, perhaps rather grandly, to ally with the respective spirits of Psychogeography, Flâneurism or The Situationist Dérive.  In reality, it may be no more than the routine search for environmental/contextual stimulus that could be expected of any artist, but I hope there are certain attitudes of mind brought to my excursions that ally them, at least partially, with those theoretical traditions.

Whether carried out on foot, by bike or car, or indeed any other available transport means, I’ve been in the habit of referring to all this as ‘Urban Exploration’.  However, last month I read an article, leading in turn to a little further online research, which makes me think I should adopt a different term for my activities.


Robert Macfarlane's Own Hero Shot.  Photo: Bradley Garrett


The article, written by Robert Macfarlane for The Guardian [1.], was essentially a promo for a recently published book by American hipster academic and urban adventurer, Bradley Garrett.  Garrett’s book, ‘Explore Everything: Placehacking The City’ [2.], is the culmination of his own PhD studies and participation in what others were calling Urban Exploration long before I ever adopted the label.  In this context, we’re talking about those intrepid, adrenalised trespassers who mount planned incursions into abandoned industrial ruins, drainage and transport systems, construction sites, disused military installations and any secret place where access or free passage are restricted.  I was well aware of the phenomenon, but hadn’t appreciated just how widespread, (indeed global), an activity it had become.  In the article, Macfarlane even goes beyond the normal scope of a book reviewer by allowing Garrett and his associates to conduct him in a little underground expedition of his own.


Photo: Bradley Garrett


There’s a fairly obvious extreme or street sports aspect to all this and not a little of the high-fiving and whooping rad-dudery that often characterise those worlds, (although it’s clearly not an entirely male culture).  Many ‘Urbex’ trespasses take place in filthy, dark, dangerous and physically demanding locations and the macho skills of spelunking, climbing, orienteering and sprinting, (to evade security), can all be called upon.  Experience, research and careful pre-planning are essential.  Injury and possible long-term ill health are obvious risks and there have been occasional deaths. 

However, behind the hardcore bravado are a number of intriguing theoretical or psychological impulses behind these attempts to hack or subvert the highly prescribed/proscribed urban environments most of us now inhabit.  There is an implied testing of how much freedom of movement remains to the average citizen and also of the tricky issues around private and official control of once public spaces.  ‘Urbexers’ pose an overt challenge to the boundaries between legal and civil trespass and the (often unexplained) presumption of secrecy that pertains to so many sites.  For some, clear political agendas run through the subculture as a whole.  They may seek to uncover the possible (or imagined) conspiracies of silence, exploitation or sinister activity attached to certain sites or illuminate, (quite literally), how marginalised populations are forced to live rough or actually underground in a city’s hidden zones.  Elsewhere, they may simply claim the right to access a panoramic view or vantage point that has been annexed for profit, (it costs £25.00 to view London from ‘The Shard’s’ summit).


Photo: Bradley Garrett


For others, the motivation appears more involved with a very human desire to simply explore the hidden rather than any specific political impulse.  They take a delight in peeling back the multiple layers of urban geography to discover what lies beneath, (or indeed above), and seek out a vertical as well as horizontal reading of the built environment.  This reflects a desire to understand the physical systems and infrastructure that make a city function, (underground railways, drainage, etc.), but inevitably leads also into reading the chronological strata that constitute it, (wartime remnants, industrial archeology, abandonment, earlier incarnations, past lives, etc.).  Wherever the emphasis is placed, I think there is an unmistakable Psychogeographical impulse behind the phenomenon of Urban Exploration.


Photo: Bradley Garrett


There’s an essentially benign anarchy to it all too, coupled with a refreshing impulse to intrude non-destructively.  The general attitude is one of simply occupying and witnessing a site for the sake of simply being there.  In contrast to those who seek to alter, damage or ‘decorate’ forbidden locations, most Urbexers are content to simply ‘be’ in a place then document their discoveries in photographs and videos.  Where a gesture has been required, hanging a removable banner or posting visual evidence and ‘hero shots’ on web forums have generally been sufficient.  This process of routine visual chronicling and a delight in the physical appearance of generally overlooked or transitional places is of obvious relevance to my own creative habits.


Photo: Bradley Garrett


A major, inescapable connection is the theoretical legacy of The Situationist International. Desires to short-circuit the prescribed street plan, to experience the city with immediacy and subjectivity, or to sample experiences beyond the mere surface of things, are essentially Situationist in nature.  This is true, be they political or artistic statements or just strategies to experience one’s surroundings more fully.  Urban Exploration takes its place, alongside Graffiti and Street Art, Happenings, Pop-up or Flash Mob gestures, and the tented encampments of the Occupy movement, as they ripple out from Paris, 1968 and the wider Debordian moment.  Above all, it is an explicit attempt to access a grittier, more vivid reality, however grimy or hazardous, behind the slick corporate facades and hypnotic, pixelated imagery of the Capitalist Spectacle.


Bradley Garrett: Underground Academic


Although his primary focus appears to have shifted, Bradley Garrett himself has been an enthusiastic participant in Urban Exploration.  He was particularly associated with the London Consolidation Crew, - infamous for visiting every one of the London Tube network’s disused ‘Ghost Stations’, and for their climb to the top of the unfinished ‘Shard’ tower.  ‘Explore Everything’ is his account of those years and the exploits and ultimate demise in the face of legal action, of the LCC.  If he exhibits a typically American self-confidence and bushy-tailed desire to make each year more memorable than the last, (which could get a little tiring, I fear), he also brings a serious academic intent to the subject as his websites demonstrate.  Whilst the www.placehacking.co.uk site is now archived, www.bradleygarrett.com remains fully active and covers the whole field of his studies as a Geographer and Ethnographer, as well as accounts from the Urbex front line.  Both sites are full of his vivid photography, insightful writing and links to impressive video work.  Particularly recommended among the latter are, ‘Crack The Surface:Episode I’ and ‘Episode II’ and ‘Urban Explorers: Quests For Myth, MysteryAnd Meaning’.  Whilst the first two showcase many of the scene’s prime movers and shakers in action, the latter provides fascinating reflections on it from various academic viewpoints.

Even in my prime, I never had the physical prowess or reckless courage demonstrated by Garrett and his contemporaries and remain essentially risk-averse where physical jeopardy or legal action are concerned.  Nevertheless, in my own cowardly way, I fully understand the curiosity that can lead one to poke the camera lens where it may not always be welcome in search of alternative readings of a city.  I’m fascinated by these bulletins from travellers into regions I might not dare enter myself but really don’t think I can continue to apply the term ‘Urban Exploration’ to my own more sedate, (but hopefully, creatively valid), excursions.  Perhaps, from now on, ‘Urban Observation’ or perhaps ‘Urban Documentation’ will have to do instead.


Postscript:

From reading Bradley Garrett's own blogging, I know he is, (slightly ironically), very protective of his own intellectual property.  I hope he'll accept my appropriation of his images here in the spirit it is meant, (as a celebration of his work) rather than any kind of money making rip-off.








Saturday, 12 May 2012

You Know What Thinking Did...


Here’s an attempt to detail something of the tangled internal monologue over my work mentioned in my last post.  Forgive the length and style of this one, - the form reflects something of the mental over-activity that has sometimes halted my creative workflow.  I emphasise the past tense there because the whole point of this is to demonstrate that ‘I don’t do that any more’.  This is an initial splurge but I intend to keep breaking these issues into manageable chunks and keep working in the expectation that various issues will find resolution in the paintings in their own time time.

Jaques Villegle & Raymond Hains, 'Ach Alma Manetro, '
Torn Poster Collage, 1949

I recently read a book called ‘Art, Word & Image – 2000 Years of Visual/Textual Interraction’ [1.] and for the first time really started to appreciate the linkages between Cubism Dada Surrealism Post War radical movements including Letterism Nouveau Realism and Situationism through to Pop Art and Conceptualism and more recent phenomena like Punk aesthetics and Street Art and my eye was caught by the work of Jacques Villegle and also of Raymond Hains and Mimmo Rotella ...


Raymond Hains, 'Sans Titre', Torn Poster Collage,  1998


Mimmo Rotella, ' With a Smile', Torn Poster Collage, 1962


...who all worked with torn posters which chimed with my own fascination for them and numerous photos I’ve taken of the subject including my images of tattered hoardings at New Year and the amalgamation of reclaimed posters into my own recent paintings and also how my house is currently full of coloured billboard tatters collected on recent local forays and that I hope to use in collages somehow plus I also thought about how those artists drew on Duchamp’s Dadaist tradition of the Readymade and employed a rip and paste approach to text and image fragments to subvert standard meanings or invent new ones randomly and to regard the city street as a valid arena for expression in its own right and thus to look back to ideas of the urban flaneur and forward to the theories of the Situationist International whilst retaining a distinct Pop flavour and also about a  contemporary Street Artist called Vhills/Alexandre Farto who I became aware of a while back who’ s also done some striking work with torn posters...


Alexandre Farto, Billboard Collage, 2008


Alexandre Farto, 'Compro Logo Existo', Torn Poster Collage


...and suddenly I felt that my own things are quite polite and limited in scope in comparison being essentially about the street rather of it and quite quickly I’ve found that my researches have led me to investigate the theories of Guy Debord and The Situationist International whose ideas about textual manipulation developed the word-games of Surrealism and the Letterists into the still-common subversive strategy of Detournement and who also embraced the notion of the Derive as an aimless but observational urban wandering to propose a formal urban psychogeography...


Guy Debord (With Glasses at Head of Table) & Members
of the Situationist International, Gothenburg, 1961


Situationist Derive Map of Paris


...where different quarters and zones might be defined by mood atmosphere or subjective response in reaction to the alienation and boredom that result from the imperatives of bureaucratic authority and capitalist economics and this made me recognise how these slightly barmy notions actually reflect something of my own responses to the environment I inhabit and just how important a sense of place has always been to me both in my work and my life but how so far I’ve usually regarded it in a largely personal context like when I haunt specific hometown locations significant to my personal history whereas Situationism became ever more politicised and arrived at a form of Post Marxist Geography that inevitably degenerated into the self-defeating theoretical dead ends and pedantic infighting typical of all self proclaimed revolutionary movements notwithstanding some really interesting ideas about the spectacular but ultimately alienated nature of modern societies and the fact it became a significant contributor to the radical uprisings in Paris in 1968 not least in the use of provocative if obscure graffiti slogans and a strong sense of the street as territory reclaimed through staged actions...


Paris 1968

'Society is an Carnivorous Flower'

'Beneath The Pavement, The Beach'


...which all seems quite apposite just now because its possible to see how these ideas about urban space permitted access and territorial control all feed into contemporary phenomena like the anti-capitalist Occupy movement and the 2011 riots and the multiple ways in which private or government interests seek to annexe public spaces or deny access in the name of security or direct our movements through increasingly controlled permitted channels or exert social control through housing policy or simply price the poor out of neighbourhoods or redevelop well established areas of cities with questionable effects or create magnificent palaces of leisure and consumerism or use economic drivers to shape population distribution or even how the plethora of textual interventions in our streets cover the whole gamut from the strictly authoritarian and utilitarian through the commercial to the strategically subversive and just plain criminal...



...and I realise I’m increasingly attuned to all this as I traverse my own city and observe the rapid changes its going through and the constant tension between decay and renewal revealed in its physical surfaces not to mention the transformations that Britain has undergone in my own lifetime sometimes for the better but sometimes also in an alienating way and making those connections really was exhilarating and there’s no denying that distinct elements of all this have been creeping into my work of late but in ways that again seem a bit superficial and it raises loads of questions about how I want to order and prioritise it all in terms of the visual/observational versus the textual/conceptual and if it's preferable to maintain a detached philosophical stance or risk straying into political engagement or whether art is most like itself when it just seeks to witness and reflect the visual world which may well include multiple clues to all of the above whilst resisting any particular position on it because I can never get away from my deep engagement with the visual as primary stimulus.

Belgrave Gate, Leicester, 2009


...and by the way see paintings as so much more than just culturally obsolete tradable product and anyway these radical cultural movements always seem to conclude that no pre-existing art form can be tolerated just violent gesture or politically correct strategy and everything else must be subsumed in anarchistic nihilism and perpetual revolution despite the fact that they all end up in museums and books and academic curricula just like everything else and this is certainly true of the Parisian student uprisings of 1968 and the Punk movement both of which are now memorialised and periodically rehashed...



...whilst street art readily creeps into galleries and fills numerous glossy books and even Situationism itself could simply be seen as the last gasp of the twentieth century Avant Garde and in passing I wonder why I wasn’t more aware of Situationism years ago given that my teenage years coincided with the relatively brief moment of Punk...


...so returning to my work I oscillate between the feeling that creative practice carried out in our period of historical crises should attempt to incorporate something of this radical tradition even though it moved past painting long ago and probably reflects a political sensibility that has more to do with the last century than the current situation and the feeling that by now we’ve surely outgrown the idea that paintings can only be tradable artefacts of a spectacular society and I wonder if actually I should permit myself a much wider remit that with Gerhard Richter's admirable stance of engaged neutrality in mind permits more open-ended responses to the relationship between text and the urban environment within an overarching psychogeographical umbrella...

Leicester, 2012



...and that has made me go back to re-read Merlin Coverly’s excellent survey of the subject [2.] but mostly I agonise over how to encompass some of all this without resorting to trite or obvious clichés or over simplistic signifiers to which I fear I can be too subject or indeed how to find my own voice within it all rather than just travelling already well trodden paths and at this point I can almost hear you shouting JUST SHUT UP YOU’LL NEVER GET ANYWHERE IF YOU DON’T STOP OVER ANALYSING EVERYTHING!

I don’t necessarily expect you to have read all the way through that but I do feel better for putting it down.  It does seem that one of the functions of a blog is to externalise things that might otherwise remain as mental barriers to creativity.  It’s likely I’ll return to these themes in future posts in which case I’ll attempt to exert more order over my writings as well as my thought processes.




[1.]:  John Dixon Hunt, David Lomas & Michael Corris, 'Art, Word & Image - 2000 Years of Visual/Textual Interraction', London, Reaktion Books Ltd., 2010

[2.]:  Merlin Coverly, 'Psychogeography', Harpenden UK, Pocket Essentials, 2010


Other Sources:


Guy Debord, 'Why Lettrism?', Paris, Potlach No. 22, 1955

Guy Debord, 'Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography', Brussels, Les Levres Nues, 1955

Guy Debord, 'The Society of the Spectacle', 1967, Trans. Ken Knabb, http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/debord/

Ken Knabb, 'Situationist International Anthology', Berkeley CA., Bureau of Public Secrets, 2006

Marco Livingstone, 'Pop Art - A Continuing History', London, Thames & Hudson, 1990